Texanskin
01-23-2006, 06:53 PM
You dont think we can get that last win to over take the seaweeds?lol.lol.
2006 NFC PredictionsTexanskin 01-23-2006, 06:53 PM You dont think we can get that last win to over take the seaweeds?lol.lol. skinsguy 01-23-2006, 08:30 PM I know it's a little early for this considering Free Agency and the Draft hasnt begun yet but here is my Pre- FA/Draft predictions for the NFC. 1.Seahawks 13-3 2.Redskins 12-4 3.Panthers 11-5 4.Vikings 10-6 5.Giants 10-6 6.Falcons 9-7 7.Buccaneers 9-7 8.Eagles 9-7 9.Cardinals 8-8 10.Cowboys 8-8 11.Bears 8-8 12.Packers 7-9 13.Rams 7-9 14.Saints 6-10 15.Lions 6-10 16.49ERS 5-11 I think the Seahags are a one hit wonder. They did look rather impressive against the Panthers though. SouperMeister 01-23-2006, 08:39 PM I think the Seahags are a one hit wonder. They did look rather impressive against the Panthers though. Frankly, the Skins D played Seattle much tougher than Carolina. We're left to wonder what might have been had Carlos Rogers not dropped the INT for a 10-0 Skins lead. I'll say this - if we get a rematch, Al Saunders won't be nearly so conservative as Gibbs was in Seattle. Their weak link on defense is the secondary, and Gibbs didn't try to exploit that until they were down 2 TDs. It would be sweet if the Skins could get home field, but as bad as the NFC West is, Seattle could go 13-3 or 14-2 next year. Texanskin 01-24-2006, 01:44 PM I think the best preparation for the playoffs is the NFC East. Once we come out no less than #2, we should have no problems in the playoffs. With our offense being wide open next year, Seattle wont have a chance. TheMalcolmConnection 01-24-2006, 02:17 PM Frankly, the Skins D played Seattle much tougher than Carolina. We're left to wonder what might have been had Carlos Rogers not dropped the INT for a 10-0 Skins lead. I'll say this - if we get a rematch, Al Saunders won't be nearly so conservative as Gibbs was in Seattle. Their weak link on defense is the secondary, and Gibbs didn't try to exploit that until they were down 2 TDs. It would be sweet if the Skins could get home field, but as bad as the NFC West is, Seattle could go 13-3 or 14-2 next year. You don't think that they'll lose Hutchinson and Alexander? DC_75 01-24-2006, 10:54 PM Here are my early predictions for next year. NFC Washington 12-4 Tampa Bay 12-4 Seattle 10-6 Chicago 9-7 Atlanta 10-6 Dallas 10-6 Dallas beats Seattle Atlanta beats Chicago Washington beat dallas Tampa beats Atlanta NFC championship Washington over TBAY skns03 01-25-2006, 12:22 PM skins are gonna make the playoffs and the giants from the east :towel: Redskins_P 01-25-2006, 12:31 PM I think the Skins have a really good chance to win the division. And I don't agree that Philly is still the team to beat. They have no running back, and their o-line is suspect. I know they had a lot of injuries, but I don't see them coming back as strong as they were before. hail_2_da_skins 01-25-2006, 01:09 PM Realisticly, the NFC East will be a dog fight. Every team in the NFC East is competitive, even the Cowgirls. The Redskins are off to a great start in the offseason but they have to upgrade their personnel especially at wide receiver, defensive line and the quarterback position (Brunnel needs to improve or Campbell needs to take the job). This is how I see the rankings in the East. 1. Washington Redskins 2. Philadelphia Eagles 3. New York Giants 4. Dallas Cowboys Texanskin 01-25-2006, 03:04 PM You think Philly will be better than the giants? The Eagles are getting Westbrooke back along with McNabb but their receivers are trash. Eli at least has receivers.(although he cant win ball games with his arm) |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum