Redskins_P
01-19-2006, 03:54 PM
Offiss started a thread about the QB situation, so I decided to start one about the running game.
We all know the success KC had with Larry Johnson and Priest Holmes. How different is Saunders running scheme compared to Gibbs'? Will we see more stretch plays? Counters? Screens? Larry Johnson put up some nice numbers yardage wise and TD's. I can see Portis having another record breaking season for us.
I think the biggest benefitor of all of this is Portis and obviously the offensive line.
What do you guys think?
12thMan
01-19-2006, 03:57 PM
Wow, we're all over this one, huh? You would have thought this was the first day of the draft.
I mentioned on the QB thread that Saunders will further expand on Gibbs' current philosophy. He'll add a wrinkle here and there and inject some new play calling.
I don't, however, that any single player will be transformed by this one move alone.
dmek25
01-19-2006, 04:01 PM
this will probably help alot with the run game by using the screen pass to portis.nothing slows down d lineman like a screen
jdlea
01-19-2006, 04:01 PM
I don't think that it will change any one player, but the entire unit. I think Portis will be better, the QB play will be better, playcalling won't be so stale, the O Line will be better and Cooley will get more passes. I think this offense will be transformed.
SanFranSkinsFan
01-19-2006, 04:02 PM
Offiss started a thread about the QB situation, so I decided to start one about the running game.
We all know the success KC had with Larry Johnson and Priest Holmes. How different is Saunders running scheme compared to Gibbs'? Will we see more stretch plays? Counters? Screens? Larry Johnson put up some nice numbers yardage wise and TD's. I can see Portis having another record breaking season for us.
I think the biggest benefitor of all of this is Portis and obviously the offensive line.
What do you guys think?
Yeah, this move can only make Portis better, but he's already pretty good. What Saunders really should do is see if he can make Taylor Jacobs into something more than eye candy.
skinsguy
01-19-2006, 04:04 PM
There isn't much of a difference in the philosophy of Saunders to Gibbs. Both offenses are pretty much the same, with Saunders basically opening things up more downfield - which should make alot of people here very happy. You'll probably see alot more screen passes (remember that screen pass to Priest Holmes that went all the way for a TD against us?) I believe if anything, this will help to further the offensive philosophy of Joe Gibbs, but Saunders has the keys to really make the philosophy really shine (with having a top ranked offense for the past few years!)
12thMan
01-19-2006, 04:06 PM
Yeah, this move can only make Portis better, but he's already pretty good. What Saunders really should do is see if he can make Taylor Jacobs into something more than eye candy.
Saunders is good, but he 'aint no magician!
crafty
01-19-2006, 04:10 PM
Taylor Jacobs Is Almost Is Like Desmond Howard A Waste Of A Good Draft Pick.i Say Lets Get A Proven Wide Receiver Threw Free Agency.lets Not Waste Our Draft Picks This Yr.
Redskins_P
01-19-2006, 04:14 PM
Saunders is good, but he 'aint no magician!
HAHA. True.
I think Jacobs needs to go hang out with Barry Bonds and do a couple of cycles in the offseason.
PSUSkinsFan21
01-19-2006, 04:16 PM
Yeah, this move can only make Portis better, but he's already pretty good. What Saunders really should do is see if he can make Taylor Jacobs into something more than eye candy.
I'm totally done with Jacobs. In my eyes, he's officially hit "bust" status.