Will Saunders Affect Our QB Situation?

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

That Guy
01-25-2006, 12:12 PM
So what's your excuse for the preseason and the 1st game of the season, 4 possessions, 2 turnovers?

i know you're trying to make a point, but that fumble would have happened to anyone, ramsey got a piledriver straight into the ground and had to come off the field due to it. At the time a lot of people were expecting a flagrant foul to cancel the fumble. Either way, in that one speicifc instance it wasn't sloppy ball handling that caused that fumble, and at least 90% of QBs would also lose it.

railcon56
01-25-2006, 12:14 PM
Brunell lost 6 fumbles in 2005. Your boy Ramsey lost 3 fumbles in 2004, and he only played half a season. Meaning their fumble rates are equal. But Ramsey throws way more interceptions than Brunell.

Brunell is way better at managing a game. And if you don't like that, then you don't like winning.
Cause Brunell plays not to lose..... instead of playing to win....see but as the stakes got higher and teams got better that was no longer Good enough.......I bet Mr Saunders changes that!!!!! We'll see but I wouldn't count Ramsey out just yet....

12thMan
01-25-2006, 12:20 PM
Brunell plays not to lose?? Explain 10 wins, and furthermore Brunell doesn't call his own plays. So how is he alone responsible for "playing not lose"?

Redskins_P
01-25-2006, 12:28 PM
Cause Brunell plays not to lose..... instead of playing to win....see but as the stakes got higher and teams got better that was no longer Good enough.......I bet Mr Saunders changes that!!!!! We'll see but I wouldn't count Ramsey out just yet....


I would count Ramsey out. Why? Because Gibbs informed Brunell, and Campbell of the Saunders hiring, and NOT future hall of famer Ramsey.

Ramsey is done here. Just deal with it and move on.

backrow
01-25-2006, 12:35 PM
Let's look at the 2005 Pro Bowl roster and compare the QBs that were named for the NFC.

Matt Hasselbeck: 3459 yards, 24 TDs, 9 INT. 98.2 rating, led his team to 13 wins. Highest rated passer in the NFC.

Jake Delhomme: 3421 yards, 24 TDs, 16 INT. 88.1 rating, led his team to 11 wins. 4th rated passer in the NFC.

Michael Vick: 2412 yards, 15 TDs, 13 INT. 73.1 rating, led his team to 8 wins. 12th rated passer in the NFC.

And now Brunell: 3050 yards, 23 TDs, 10 INT. 85.9 rating, led his team to 10 wins. 5th rated passer in the NFC.

Now draw your own conclusions. I don't see how Brunell isn't at least in the discussion when you talk about who had Pro Bowl caliber seasons in the NFC.


Pro Bowl not quite. Brunell was 5th. Who was #2 and #3?

You have to disregard Vick. A popular choice, but he sure stunk up my Fantasy team all year!

TheMalcolmConnection
01-25-2006, 01:13 PM
I would count Ramsey out. Why? Because Gibbs informed Brunell, and Campbell of the Saunders hiring, and NOT future hall of famer Ramsey.

Ramsey is done here. Just deal with it and move on.

So offiss will you still be with us after Ramsey is traded? :woot::woot::woot:

12thMan
01-25-2006, 01:28 PM
So offiss will you still be with us after Ramsey is traded? :woot::woot::woot:

I think that's question #3!!!

railcon56
01-25-2006, 06:37 PM
I would count Ramsey out. Why? Because Gibbs informed Brunell, and Campbell of the Saunders hiring, and NOT future hall of famer Ramsey.

Ramsey is done here. Just deal with it and move on.
You're assuming ........when it happens then i might...... I'm more than sure saunders knows that Brunell cant execute the offense the way he expects.... so we'll see .... hell he could barely execute this anemic offense we have now.......

railcon56
01-25-2006, 06:38 PM
Brunell plays not to lose?? Explain 10 wins, and furthermore Brunell doesn't call his own plays. So how is he alone responsible for "playing not lose"?
Greg Williams won those games ........not brunell

JoeRedskin
01-25-2006, 09:00 PM
Greg Williams won those games ........not brunell

Monday night in Dallas. 'nuff said.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum