That Guy
01-23-2006, 03:39 PM
Brunell actually has a stronger arm than Green, in both distance and velocity.
i seriously doubt that.
i seriously doubt that.
Will Saunders Affect Our QB Situation?That Guy 01-23-2006, 03:39 PM Brunell actually has a stronger arm than Green, in both distance and velocity. i seriously doubt that. skinsguy 01-23-2006, 06:00 PM There are some that believe that Ramsey wasn't given a fair shake, and when he did, it was under Spurrier's rudimentary offense. Furthermore, they say that Gibbs unfairly yanked him before he could fully prove himself. What's your point? offiss 01-23-2006, 06:12 PM What's your point? His point is people assume that because we made the playoffs Brunell was the best choice, but that's not nessasarily the case, who's to say if Ramsey is the QB that we wouldn't have won the division and had a by, and possibly be on our way to detroit this week? At the very least it is no stretch to say that Ramsey could have guided us to the playoffs as well. Just because we made the playoff's doesn't mean that Brunell was the best man for the job, what it does mean is that Ramsey wasen't given a chance to prove otherwise. skinsguy 01-23-2006, 08:10 PM His point is people assume that because we made the playoffs Brunell was the best choice, He would be correct since Brunell has already proven that he can lead us into the post season. but that's not nessasarily the case, who's to say if Ramsey is the QB that we wouldn't have won the division and had a by, and possibly be on our way to detroit this week? At the very least it is no stretch to say that Ramsey could have guided us to the playoffs as well. That is the case. It's been proven fact. We made it to the playoffs and advanced. We took a major step in the right direction with Mark Brunell playing quarterback for this team. There is no solid evidence that Patrick Ramsey could have done the same or better. Just because we made the playoff's doesn't mean that Brunell was the best man for the job, what it does mean is that Ramsey wasen't given a chance to prove otherwise. That doesn't make any sense. Of course it proves that Brunell was the best man for the job. You have no proof to debate with me on this. Only excuses. offiss 01-24-2006, 01:51 AM skinsguy wrote- That is the case. It's been proven fact. We made it to the playoffs and advanced. We took a major step in the right direction with Mark Brunell playing quarterback for this team. There is no solid evidence that Patrick Ramsey could have done the same or better. Your kidding right? No solid evidence? How could he not have done the same? In case you didn't notice Brunell did nothing the last 3 games, I believe Patrick is capable of doing nothing and allowing our defense to win games for him. Do you think Brunells play in the playoffs was a major step in the right direction? :eek: railcon56 01-24-2006, 02:04 AM Your kidding right? No solid evidence? How could he not have done the same? In case you didn't notice Brunell did nothing the last 3 games, I believe Patrick is capable of doing nothing and allowing our defense to win games for him. Do you think Brunells play in the playoffs was a major step in the right direction? :eek: And he Did nothing in the Raider Game or San Diego game.... CooleyFan 01-24-2006, 02:22 AM Yeah, Taylor Jacobs is a homo. He needs to go back home on a greyhound. 12thMan 01-24-2006, 09:20 AM He would be correct since Brunell has already proven that he can lead us into the post season. That is the case. It's been proven fact. We made it to the playoffs and advanced. We took a major step in the right direction with Mark Brunell playing quarterback for this team. There is no solid evidence that Patrick Ramsey could have done the same or better. That doesn't make any sense. Of course it proves that Brunell was the best man for the job. You have no proof to debate with me on this. Only excuses. You pretty much summed up my point. skins052bgr8 01-24-2006, 03:06 PM There are some that believe that Ramsey wasn't given a fair shake, and when he did, it was under Spurrier's rudimentary offense. Furthermore, they say that Gibbs unfairly yanked him before he could fully prove himself. I like Ramsey and think whatever happens to him in the future he will get better, there is no way he has reached his full potential for the exact reason you stated above. He may have been in the NFL for 4 years, but he was being coached by all College coaches not even nfl assistants, with College schemes in a complex nfl defensive system where it is essential to have good coaches to help you develop and have a chance at being good. Essentially in my mind as far as Ramsey and his development it did not start until Gibbs got here. Those who think Ramsey could develop into anything those first two years are just foolish. That being said I hardly think you can even judge any of the QB's in Gibbs first year it was just horrible performance for whatever reason, but I can assure you it was not all Ramsey.I do think Ramsey is gone, but he will be a starter for another team in this league and do well. Ramsey has had a short leash for some reason by all his coaches, Spurrier circus of carousel QB and Gibbs this year after one game. He just has not had a fair shake. TheMalcolmConnection 01-24-2006, 03:09 PM Yeah, Taylor Jacobs is a homo. He needs to go back home on a greyhound. Are you just mad because he broke up with you? |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum