MTK
01-19-2006, 10:04 AM
vote and discuss
Campbell or Brunell in 2006?MTK 01-19-2006, 10:04 AM vote and discuss ArtMonkDrillz 01-19-2006, 10:17 AM I feel funny saying this after the way I felt last year, but as long as Brunell is back to being healthy I see no reason for him not to start. We played very well early on in the season and I think he can do that for at least another season (obviously barring injury). I would love to see Campbell get more PT, but I think he really needs to get more practice. We showed some good traits in the preseason last year but he also made some typical rookie mistakes. If he plays more this preseason (because Brunell is at the point where he probably doesn't need to take a ton of preseason snaps) then maybe he'll be ready to be our #2. celts32 01-19-2006, 10:22 AM If "ready to go" means campbel is ready to play at a level at least close to Brunell last year than I say Campbel, but if not than Brunell. I want the best QB on the field...this is a playoff team now so i don't want to squander a whole season waiting on Campbell. The Bills made a similar decision last year by replacing Bledsoe with losman on what was a contending team and it blew up in their faces. Master4Caster 01-19-2006, 11:08 AM This is not college. Experience counts in the pros. Brunell might not be what he was with the Jags, but his game savvy helped the Skins a lot this season -- and next. Campbell will be a lot better off, and better for the Redskins over the long haul, if he spent another season watching and learning. Think of it this way. Patrick Ramsey is a much better qb today because he was on the bench learning from Brunell and Gibbs/Musgrave than when he was starting and running Steve Spurrier's concepts. Some other team will get a very fine qb if he leaves. Not sure I like that. firstdown 01-19-2006, 11:10 AM I voted Brunell but feel Gibbs will make the best decision of which QB has the best chances of leading us to the playoffs. 12thMan 01-19-2006, 11:21 AM I voted Brunell, simply because we haven't seen enough of Campbell to come to a conclusion at this point. He could possibly take over for Brunell somewhere if he starts '06 season the way he ended '05. jdlea 01-19-2006, 11:22 AM I'm pretty torn on this one. Brunell had a fine year for this team and helped lead them to the playoffs. However, I don't think that he'll ever be better than he was this season, so I don't really know how next year will go. I say if Brunell looks bad in the preseason and gets knocked out of the game during the first series of next season, Campbell should get the job. :) EEich 01-19-2006, 11:28 AM The question is: do we want to make it to the Playoffs or do we want to win the SuperBowl? I believe that the Redskins have reached the ceiling with Brunell. They have to give Campbell every opportunity to start next season, with the understanding that there will be some growing pains. onlydarksets 01-19-2006, 11:30 AM Brunell did fine, but what's the point of another year on the bench for Campbell if he is to be the QB of the future? If he is indeed ready to play, he needs playing time to get better. hail_2_da_skins 01-19-2006, 11:30 AM Brunnel does a good job of managing the game but is incapable of taking the team to the next level. I say lets start developing the young quarterback and give him a shot. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum