Brunell sucks

Pages : 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7

BigSKINBauer
01-01-2006, 07:39 PM
No ****ing enough. The thing is the reason why Brunell is better for US!than Ramsey: we are a running team ramsey throws INTS. Done Brunell does not throw INTS!!! He wil not get as many yards as ramsey but he is calm cool and collected. We rush for 150+ and that is the type of QB we need.

HE was hurt. I can't believe you want him gone next year. Some people still hold a grudge from last year

mooby
01-01-2006, 07:48 PM
brunell was manageable today. Yeah he didn't complete a lot of passes, but give the guy some credit. Without him we wouldn't be in the playoffs.

EternalEnigma21
01-01-2006, 07:55 PM
I think he's still a good QB.. but if he's hurt... he's inaccurate, and therefore we risk losing, because we risk turnovers and we turn one demensional. That worries me that we can't put PR in there when Brunell is only about 70% healthy and ineffective... also why risk further injury to Brunell... but oh well...

Brunell should definately be back next year.

dag
01-01-2006, 07:59 PM
New member here, first post.

Brunell looked awful in the first half, but was pretty solid in the second half, almost as if he had more confidence in his knee to be able to plant it firmly. The balls weren't sailing on him as much.

But in terms of getting rid of him, besides this being a topic best discussed after the season, you only get rid of someone if you've got a better option.

PorterHouse
01-01-2006, 08:06 PM
is this guy for real? brunell sucks come on!!! this guy was breathing life into this offense before anyone was doin anything. is this guy really a fan? one bad game and your ready to jump ship. do your home work eagles- redskins never an easy game no matter whos the better team.

mooby
01-01-2006, 08:33 PM
New member here, first post.

Brunell looked awful in the first half, but was pretty solid in the second half, almost as if he had more confidence in his knee to be able to plant it firmly. The balls weren't sailing on him as much.

But in terms of getting rid of him, besides this being a topic best discussed after the season, you only get rid of someone if you've got a better option.

:welcome: to the boards.

4mrusmc
01-01-2006, 08:51 PM
Come on guys let's not pile on Brunell. Like I've said before the guy has heart and smarts. And J.G. is a much better evailuater of talent than all of us here. Let's get some pay back from tampax bay!

SUNRA
01-01-2006, 08:59 PM
Mark Brunell is as good as the Wideouts make him. James Thrash and Taylor Jacobs are non-existent on offense and have made it difficult for Moss to separate from a triple team coverage. Thrash runs some of the worst routes I have seen. I want him to do well, but he has not been able to give 100% do to injuries. His routes are not sharp and his defensive skills are horrible. He just gave up on the play after the CB caught the INT. We will be shopping for Brandon Llyod on the off season.

CRT3
01-01-2006, 09:05 PM
Bozzy come om this guy has been pretty effecient. Most of the high ball you can sttribute to him not putting weight on the front foot. Butt this guy has been "spicy" of late.

skinsguy
01-01-2006, 09:23 PM
Sorry, but this is a stupid thread.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum